          |
ImpacTeen
Publications
Tobacco Institute
Lobbying at the State and Local Levels of Government in the 1990s. Morely
CP, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Giovino GA, Horan JK. Tobacco Control, Vol.
11 (Suppl 1), i102-i109 (2002).
Objective:
To describe variation in Tobacco Institute (TI) lobbying expenditures
across states and test whether these expenditures vary in relationship
to measures of tobacco control activity at the state level.
Independent variable: Data for this study came from the TI's State
Activities Division (SAD) annual budgets for the years 1991-97, excluding
1993. These data include budgetary information pertaining to state and
local lobbying activity and special projects reported by state.
Dependent variables: The following measures of state tobacco control
activity during the period 1991 to 1997 were considered: (1) American
Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) funding; (2) voter initiatives
to raise cigarette taxes; (3) cigarette excise tax level; (4) workplace
smoking restrictions; (5) the intensification of smoke-free air laws covering
private worksites, government worksites, and restaurants; (6) the intensification
of strength of sales to minors laws; (7) the intensification of strength
of laws that punish minors for possessing, purchasing, and/or using cigarettes;
(8) state status as a major grower of tobacco; (9) partisan control of
state government, 1996; and (10) an overall composite index reflecting
a state's strength of tobacco control, combining cigarette prices with
workplace and home smoking bans.
Results: The overall annual budget for the TI declined steadily
during the 1990s, from $47.7 million in 1991 to $28.1 million by 1996.
The proportion of the TI's budget allocated to the SAD remained relatively
stable at about 30%. TI expenditures for lobbyist were highest in California
where tobacco control activity has been strong for the past decade. We
found significant associations between TI SAD expenditures and cigarette
excise tax levels, the status of a state as a recipient of federal ASSIST
funds, and changes in the strength of statewide laws that penalize minors
for possessing, purchasing, and/or using cigarettes. We found little or
no association between state and local lobbying budgets of the TI and
changes in statewide smoke-free air laws, although we did find evidence
of TI special project expenditures earmarked to specific states and localities
to resist clean indoor air legislation/regulations (that is, Maryland
and New York City). We found no significant correlation between TI lobbying
expenditures and sales to minors' laws, status as a major producer of
tobacco, or partisan control of state government.
Conclusions: The findings from this study support the hypothesis
that in the 1990s tobacco control activities such as raising cigarette
excise taxes and participation in ASSIST attracted TI resources to undermine
these efforts.
HOME
| ABOUT US | PROJECT TEAMS | RESEARCH PRODUCTS
| NEWS RELEASES
RELATED PROJECTS
| OTHER WEBSITES | MEMBERS | CONTACT US
|